The Dot-Com Bubble. For those of you that forgot – this is where a lot of people made a lot of money, and for those who didn’t time it right, lost a lot of the money they helped create. Welcome circa March 2000, when the NASDAQ window shut any chance to take your Company public. Prior to March 2000, the strategy was simple. Build a dot-com, let it be any dot-com, forget about making money, raise venture capital, and then raise some more. When you finally raised 3 to 4 rounds, you hired an investment bank – and went public. And, viola – companies went public and overnight some turned into billion dollar market caps, without every making a penny. On paper, at least.
This was when I first got introduced entrepreneurism. I started ClickAgents, one of the first ad networks focused on performance based advertising. I actually didn’t raise any venture capital – since truth be told I was nervous to take any. Looking back at all the different meetings I had, one conversation came to mind. This was from a prominent investor, who basically suggested that my strategy was “flawed.” ClickAgents was doing the exact opposite of most companies he saw. We were actually profitable. Which meant we’d be valued at an EBITDA (just like a traditional company) rather than a hyped up multiple on the perception that we’d make money someday. Needless to say, ClickAgents didn’t become a billion-dollar IPO, but instead got acquired by ValueClick for $40 million. Valued of course on real metrics (profitability).
As many of you know, I then started BlueLithium and last October 2007 – sold it to Yahoo for $300 million. We were growing rapidly and were also profitable. So, we were again valued on real company metrics (profitability).
What makes me nervous – we claim the economy is in a recession, but the Web 2.0 private companies aren’t. Some of the astronomical valuations – I’ve seen from various companies, almost makes me remember 1999 all over again. The big difference here is – back when the first bubble hit – the valuations were still low in the private markets, but the public markets exaggerated them. Which meant the investors, employees, and founders could eventually cash out when the company went public. In today’s euphoria, these Web 2.0 companies are getting skyrocket valuations during their investment round. When you look at the brutality of the public markets this year and what Sarbox compliance has required to take companies public – it makes you wonder what exit strategy do these companies have if they can’t go public. I guess, that’s simple – there hoping to get bought for an even higher price.
However, I’m not sure there are buyers at these levels. At least, not enough of them.
Here are some recent valuations:
1. Slide – a Web 2.0 widget company. I’ve met the CEO myself a few times, who I respect and think very highly of, but this is a company that recently raised $50 million on a $500 million valuation. It’s supposed to do $10 to $12 million in revenue this year. Not profitable.
2. RockYou – a Web 2.0 widget company like Slide but the “mini-me” version. Is rumored to close a round of financing in the $400 million range. The revenue is supposed to be smaller than Slide. And of course, not profitable.
3. Twitter – the Web 2.0 site that lets you tell your friends what you’re doing. No revenue, no profitability, and no business model. But, about to close a round at a $100 million valuation.
4. Facebook – a great product that has close to 100 million users worldwide. But, a $15 billion valuation on $150 million in revenue. A ridiculous multiple of 100X revenue.
Some of these companies have great products, features and great teams – but also great valuations on the hope that same day they’ll turn black. This is happening – when the memory of the dot-com bust is fresh with us from 8 years ago. If this is a bubble – which I believe it to be – I hope it doesn’t cause the economy to enter into a bigger recession.
I also hope this doesn’t wipe off valuable equity created from a lot of entrepreneurs, investors, and employees who end up waiting too long to make an exit.
People should always remember, in the game of musical chairs, the music always stops. And even if the music stops it’s okay – so long as you have a business that is rapidly growing with real metrics…
Tags: bluelithium, bubble, bust, clickagents, dot-com, rebirth, rockyou, slide, startup, twitter, venture capital





June 4th, 2008 at 4:25 am
I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog.
Tim Ramsey
June 4th, 2008 at 8:02 am
Interesting evaluation. I like the fact that you look at the bigger picture. I’m not sure I agree with the whole bubble business though. To me, a bubble would imply that there are many web 2.0 companies that are receiving high valuations. I don’t think thats the case.
June 4th, 2008 at 9:19 pm
G, you did it the right way; real technology and real profits. Every time I read about some over-hyped “Widget Factory” thinking they are going to revolutionize human communication, I throw up a little bit in my mouth. Side note: Pick up “The New Age of Innovation” by C.K. Prahalad and M.S. Krishnan when you get a chance.
June 27th, 2008 at 7:00 pm
i agree, which is funny b/c I’m building and web 2.0 site called myconnec. I think there is a real market for sites like mine, but not at the valuations Facebook is getting. I like how you started your first company with no investment from the outside. That allowed you to focus on profitability instead of valuations . Hey can you tell me how you did it? B/c I’m trying to start my company and looking for ways to raise startup capital. Let me know….
June 28th, 2008 at 9:07 pm
G , What i don’t Understand is why invest in a company that is not show good profit on it’s own. What Happen to the i’m in it for a profit not to bleed red but to strick black on the sheet .
Also i sent you some info on my business i would like to see what you think about the company.
Thank you
July 21st, 2008 at 5:04 pm
G, this is amazing! Building a company without any capital help from investors. I think this is inspirational because most of us who have ideas just take a back seat when it comes to implementation of the idea due to lack of capital. You are surely a inspiration for a lot of us. I think it would be great if you could mentor some of us out here who also want to succeed. Best
November 20th, 2008 at 1:14 pm
Interesting to learn about these Web 2.0 entities. I think they would be smart to entertain all buy-outs and cash out now. The valuations are fluffed to a max, and I think it can only go to the next level, with mergers and acquistions. If Google bought Twitter, imagine the possibilities? And what if they teamed up with a wireless company like Sprint or ATT? Applications galore…and you know people would love that.